By Robert Knight
[Full text of article, an edited version of which appeared in Fine Homebuilding]
I am a residential architect, and almost every potential client that walks in the door wants to know “How much per square foot does it cost to build around here.”
For many years I had a casual, commonly accepted number for that question. Then about 15 years ago, after a spate of inflation I found out I was suddenly off by about 25%, so I set out to get more scientific about tracking what our houses cost.
In trying to systematize our price data it became apparent I needed to have a systematic way to compare buildings with different components in order to get a universal kind of square footage.
Unfortunately, having this universal square foot number doesn’t by itself solve problems when talking to clients because they have run into many different descriptions of square feet – with no disclaimers attached.
Generally, people selling houses want them to seem big so the 25′ X 40’ sq. ft. screen porch might well be counted as 1000 sq.ft. of living space in the Realtor’s description. On the other hand when someone has been told that it cost’s “$100/sq.ft. to build a house” they want the number of square feet to be as small as possible so the estimated cost is less–and then they multiply only by the interior “heated” sq.ft. and get that screen porch for free.
Of course reality lies in between. The screen porch isn’t free, but it doesn’t cost as much as heated finished space.
To get a universal “square foot” we have developed a series of fractional multipliers that we use to get what we call “factored square feet” (see spreadsheet).
We start with the Gross Heated square feet. This is a reasonably accepted industry standard. The floor area measured to the outside of the rough walls–as the building is dimensioned. We get this for all finished floors and total it separately, because this number by itself has other uses–for solar calculations, bank appraisals, real estate questions etc. This is Total Gross Heated Space (“Total Gr Ht.” on spread sheet). and it is definitely what a lot of people think of as “The square footage of the house”-but it is just the beginning.
Two story spaces we calculate and multiply by 0.5. It is an industry standard that cathedral ceilings are 1.5 times spaces with flat ceilings, (remember we have already gotten the basic floor space in our “Gross heated space” so this 0.5 is adding to that). Does it really increase the cost of a room 50% to have a cathedral ceiling? If that ceiling has open beams and lots of skylights and balconies overlooking it, it may be more than that. If it is simply a cathedral ceiling, probably not – but this is an empirical way of comparing dissimilar buildings so some simplification of reality is called for. In my experience, micro adjusting these multipliers is not wise, because it implies a level of precision that this methodology doesn’t have. This is good for a first look. When you want to know what it will really cost, spend the time and “stick it out.”
What of the other spaces???
Full basements: We usually add 10% for them. Why not more? In Maine if we use frost walls they are probably 5′ deep anyway, and we always put a ‘rat slab” in the crawl space, so going to 8’ doesn’t add that much. Multiplier = 0.10.
Attics: If they are really unfinished space under the roof eaves with only a plywood subfloor we usually take them at 20%. If it’s just trussed space we see it as part of the roof and add nothing. Incidentally I usually don’t count space under the eaves behind knee walls that are under 4 high at all in my floor calculations, so adding 20% for a real attic (which is probably more than it costs) tends to compensate for throwing away that square footage. Multiplier =0.20.
Insulated Garage: We think is about 40% of the cost of heated house space. They usually have a good deal of mechanical stuff in them, good windows, expensive doors, a shop work bench, maybe a stair up to a second floor “attic” but they are inherently simple spaces. Multiplier = 0.40.
Uninsulated or “Raw” garage: We usually use 30%. Because there is less of the above reasons. Multiplier =0.30.
Covered decks, screen porches, and roof decks over inhabited spaces we take at 40% because they involve lots of expensive finishes and detailing. Multiplier =0.40
Open wood decks we figure at 20%. We find a deck with PT framing and WRC surface, some stairs, railings, some built-in seating goes currently for around $20/sq.ft. which is about 20% of heated space at $100 sq.ft. But, you think, what if the house is a luxury model at $200 a foot, the deck won’t increase to $40 sq.ft. Won’t it? Won’t it in fact be a granite patio or be made out of South American Ipe on that level of house? If it truly won’t then reduce the multiplier – but don’t say I didn’t warn you.
The point of this is that the multipliers should reflect the kinds of buildings that you build so that the “Factored sq.ft. number that you come up with for your buildings will allow you to compare dissimilar buildings.
When we develop a square foot sheet for a house that is at all atypical, we often times will adjust the multipliers to be what we feel is a more accurate reflection of this particular building–but they rarely change more than .10 up or down. The important thing is to go through the exercise, and to realize this is only a first look at a building – before you really have enough information to truly cost it out.
Our clients often want to massage these numbers. I resist this, because the only way they get massaged is downward. If a 1000 sq.ft. 2 story space is multiplied times 0.5 it adds 500 “factored sq. ft.” to the house square footage. If that is multiplied times a sq.ft. cost of $100/sq.ft it amounts to $50,000.00. Surely it doesn’t add this much to the cost. It probably doesn’t, but other areas might add more and if we only reduce the areas that seem too high we will end up with a very optimistic estimate.
When we resist our clients efforts to massage this spreadsheet it has proven to be a pretty good predictor of building costs.
This is a simple Microsoft Excel worksheet. It’s value is not in its profundity but in its automatic nature. When I do a schematic design, I simply plug in the areas and grit my teeth and look at the number it generates. We give it to our clients with the schematic design and reality starts to get injected into the often overheated conceptual design stage of design.
Use this to create your own spread sheet–and when you get factored sq. ft. I’ll show in my next article how to use it to create a simple database of your past jobs that will give you some empirical ammunition to explain to your customers why things cost what they do. Clients don’t believe architects anyway – they always want to know “what the builder thinks.”
“I have seen builders who, instead of multiplying sq. ft. by a factor, multiply there base cost by the same factors. This gives you the same bottom line, but I think the information is less useful and a bit more prejudicial to you as a builder.
For example, your base sq.ft. price is $100/ sq.ft. and someone has a house of 2000 gross heated sq.ft. Garages, decks etc. add 1000 factored sq.ft. to it. Wouldn’t you rather have them go away with the thought that they really have a 3000 sq. ft. house than the thought that you really charge a $150/ sq.ft rather than $100/ sq.ft.”
You will note a block on the bottom for architectural fees. We do most of our work by the hour, but since it is important that clients mentally commit to the likely fee before getting in too deep, we stick what the fee range for this type of house is in terms of percentage of construction cost. This tends to keep us from issuing rosy promises, just as the other numbers tend to keep everyone honest on the construction cost.
Knight, Robert. “How Big is a Square Foot?” Knight Architect LLC, 1 July 1999, accessed 5 June 2018. knightarchitect.com/ARTICLE/howbig.html.